'Tea party' activists hold first convention 

The activists who are attending the first national "tea party" convention this weekend all agree: Government is too big. Spending is out of control. Individual freedom is at risk. And President Barack Obama's policies are making it all worse.

But that's where the consensus ends among the diverse groups of frustrated Americans who count themselves part of this fledgling coalition.

"We're afraid and we're fed up and we're angry," says Donna Henton of Blair, Nebraska. "But where this is going to go, we just don't know."

If the people attending the convention here are uncertain, imagine the difficulties of the Republican and Democratic parties, both of which are trying to leverage this antiestablishment energy for their own gain. How it works out could make a big difference in elections in November when control of Congress will be at stake.

Here's what's clear: This is an ideological mix of libertarianism and conservatism with the common denominator being lower spending and smaller government. This is a loose collection of citizen groups with no leader but many voices. And this is the product of long-simmering anger.

The convention itself has had its controversies. It's a for-profit gathering organized by Nashville lawyer Judson Phillips at the sprawling Gaylord Opryland Hotel and Convention Center.

Some would-be attendees balked at the $549 ticket price and ex-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's $100,000 fee to give the keynote address Saturday night, worried the cost was sullying the grass-roots image and preventing activists from attending.

Still, the three-day event for some 600 people is intended to try to turn grass-roots activism into ballot-box achievement. It includes sessions about involving young people in the conservative movement, using primaries to defeat liberalism and unifying the movement's many groups.

Is the movement just a blip? Or will it emerge as a lasting political powerhouse shaping elections and government for years to come?

"This movement is beginning to mature ... not as a third party but a force to be reckoned with in the traditional party structure," declared Mark Skoda, a talk radio host who founded a Memphis "tea party" group and helped organize the convention.

Yet, candidates who have adopted the "tea party" slogan are running as independents in campaigns nationwide. There are "tea party" groups that insist the convention hosts don't speak for them. And viewpoints among attendees here vary.

Some participants see the coalition as a way to strengthen the grass roots in the Republican Party. Others describe it as a people movement that is not about ideology or even party politics.

Ty Reynolds, 34, of Topeka, Kansas, put it this way: "It's about individual liberty vs. government control. Leave me alone and stop taxing me so much and be responsible stewards of the people's money."

In Washington, both major parties have struck a cautious stance, seemingly not sure what to make of the coalition but nonetheless trying to use it.

Republicans have sought to cajole the coalition into their fold. Party Chairman Michael Steele has even called himself a member. Party leaders know that a conservative third party could threaten Republicans' electoral chances by splitting the right-flank vote and triggering Democratic victories. It happened in an upstate New York congressional race last fall in a region which Democrats had not won for more than a century.

Democrats, at times, have sought to demonize the coalition, casting it as an extreme right-wing part of the Republican Party. But Obama, himself, has stepped lightly, mindful that the members' anger is real, and among their ranks are independent voters and even moderate Democrats.

What's taking place is at least somewhat similar to other modern political uprisings including the supporters of businessman Ross Perot who ran as an independent presidential candidate in the 1990s. Much like the "tea party" contingent, his supporters were largely white and middle class, a demographic Obama didn't win during the 2008 campaign and has struggled to win over since he took office.

"Tea parties" popped up last spring in small towns and big cities alike as disillusioned Americans — many never before involved in politics — protested the $787 billion economic stimulus measure, Wall Street bailouts and Obama's health care plan.

The coalition was tagged as extremist because of disruptions during health care town hall meetings hosted last summer by members of Congress and signs like "Bury Obamacare with Kennedy" that sprouted at a Washington rally last fall following Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's death.

Local leaders have struggled over the coalition's direction. There's even dispute over the name's origin: Some insist it was drawn from the 1773 tax revolt known as the Boston Tea Party, others say it's an acronym for "taxed enough already."

In 1773, around 200 colonists, incensed that the English crown was demanding payment of duties on cargoes of tea in three British ships, stormed the ships in Boston Harbor and threw the boxes of tea overboard. The event protested what the colonists considered taxation without representation.

"This is about giving voice to a people who don't feel they're being represented by either party. But it's too early to tell how this is all actually going to play out," said Nancy Hiser, 26, of Findlay, Ohio. "The only consensus here is that everyone is probably opposed to the Obama agenda."

About The Author

Staff Report

Staff Report

A daily newspaper covering San Francisco, San Mateo County and serving Alameda, Marin and Santa Clara counties.
Pin It

More by Staff Report

Latest in Nation

© 2019 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation