Shooter, not political climate, pulled trigger 

Since the 1960s, there has been a lamentable tendency in American public policy discourse to shift responsibility for acts committed by individuals to complex factors over which they supposedly have no control.

Thus, within hours of President John Kennedy’s assassination, some commentators claimed that it resulted from an “atmosphere of hate” in Dallas, not the actions of the man firing from the sixth-floor window of the Texas Schoolbook Depository, Lee Harvey Oswald.

Similarly, in 1968 the Kerner Commission appointed by President Lyndon Johnson famously pointed to “white racism” as the cause of riots in predominantly black areas of Watts and Detroit, instead of the street thugs, looters and radicals such as the Black Panthers who shattered storefront windows, tossed Molotov cocktails into occupied buildings, and killed police officers and firefighters responding to the violence.

Variations on this theme have been regularly peddled ever since, including soon after the tragic wounding of Rep. Gabriella Giffords, D-Ariz., and killing of six, including federal Judge John Roll.

Influential liberal activist and blogger Markos Mousalitas, for example, tweeted, “Mission accomplished, Sarah Palin.”

The New York Times’ Carl Hulse wrote that “while the exact motivations of the suspect in the shootings remained unclear, an Internet site tied to the man, Jared Lee Loughner, contained anti-government ramblings. And regardless of what led to the episode, it quickly focused attention on the degree to which inflammatory language, threats and implicit instigations to violence have become a steady undercurrent in the nation’s political culture.”

Similarly, the Times’ Matt Bai noted what he called the tea party movement’s “imagery of armed revolution” and accused Palin of using “words like ‘tyranny’ and ‘socialism’ when describing the president and his allies, as if blind to the idea that Americans legitimately faced with either enemy would almost certainly take up arms.”

CNN congressional reporter Jessica Yellin acknowledged that there was “no overt connection” between Palin and Saturday’s shootings, but, as The Washington Examiner’s Byron York pointed out Sunday, this did not stop her, anchor Wolf Blitzer and other CNN commentators from speculating that “Loughner acted out of rage inspired by Palin and other Republicans. Conclusions were jumped to all around.”

Political figures of speech that contain violent analogies or images are indeed commonplace, and often in poor taste, as can be seen in the images used by both Palin and Mousalitas that put Giffords in the cross hairs of an imaginary rifle sight.

But neither Palin nor Mousalitas made Loughner, the accused shooter, aim a semi-automatic 9 mm handgun at Giffords’ temple and pull the trigger. And President Barack Obama was not literal when he said during his 2008 campaign that “if they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”

The task now is to stop playing politics with the Arizona tragedy and focus on insuring a fair trial and just sentence for the individual(s) responsible for this horrendous crime.

Pin It

More by Examiner Editorial

Latest in Editorials

© 2019 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation