Review: 'Zodiac' riveting, authentic 

It was perhaps only a matter of time before David Fincher moved on from sensationalist fantasy like "Se7en" and "Fight Club" to true-crime thrillers like "Zodiac," the new film studiously based on a pair of best-sellers by controversial author Robert Graysmith. In truth, "Zodiac" is as much about Graysmith, a self-proclaimed expert on the series of unsolved murders that rocked Northern California during the 1960s and early ’70s, as about the killings themselves. In both respects, it is compelling entertainment, re-creating the crimes with chilling efficiency and tracing one man’s obsessive search for answers.

As Graysmith, a former Chronicle cartoonist who eventually parlayed his unhealthy fascination with the case into a cottage industry, Jake Gyllenhaal is sufficiently wide-eyed, pouring himself into a fanatical manhunt for the killer who taunted police and reporters such as Paul Avery (Robert Downey Jr.) with his infamous letters. Downey’s Avery is well-lubricated and gleefully self-serving, injecting himself into the case with a thrill-seeker’s abandon. That doesn’t sit well with homicide inspector Dave Toschi (Mark Ruffalo) — the real-life inspiration for both "Dirty Harry" and Steve McQueen’s character in "Bullitt" — but it does open the door for Graysmith, Avery’s overeager sidekick, to take a crack at those confounded letters.

The letters, of course, go a long way toward explaining the mythology that has grown around the Zodiac murders over the years. The Zodiac was hardly the most prolific of serial killers, but like John Doe from "Se7en," there was a gruesome theatricality to his methods. He was a master of self-promotion, with his elaborately staged crime scenes, brazen confessions and promises of carnage to come, and Fincher uses the details to great effect in an exhaustively researched epic that is endlessly intriguing without relying on gimmickry.

All of which might come as a surprise to devotees of "Se7en" and "Fight Club," accustomed as they are to Fincher’s own fondness for theatrics. Here, he effectively re-creates the paranoia that gripped San Francisco in the time of the Zodiac, but he lets the facts of the case speak for themselves and gives the material plenty of room to breathe.

His restraint pays off. "Zodiac" is as lucidly told as James Vanderbilt’s script, faithfully adapted in a way that makes sense of Graysmith’s mysterious characters and labyrinthine subplots and twists. It feels true to life, and with that authenticity comes a power that no melodramatics could have provided.

In that sense, "Zodiac" represents Fincher’s most accomplished work to date — no small praise, considering his deserved reputation as an heir-apparent to Hitchcock. At more than twoand a half hours, the film leaves little to the imagination, dutifully exploring every lead while making a convincing (but largely circumstantial) case against Graysmith’s choice as the Zodiac. It is riveting from the start, a compelling stranger-than-fiction story that feels satisfyingly resolved despite the lack of a definitive ending. 

Watch the trailer for "Zodiac" (below):

(Return to top of story)


Zodiac ****
 

Starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Mark Ruffalo, Robert Downey Jr., Anthony Edwards, Brian Cox

Written by James Vanderbilt, based on the book by Robert Graysmith

Directed by David Fincher

Rated R

Running Time: 2 hours, 38 minutes

See our Movie Showtimes page to find "Zodiac" near you.


The Zodiac Killer coined his name in a 1969 letter to the Examiner. Our special section reviews the new "Zodiac" movie and looks back at his still-unsolved killing spree.

About The Author

Staff Report

Staff Report

Bio:
A daily newspaper covering San Francisco, San Mateo County and serving Alameda, Marin and Santa Clara counties.
Pin It
Favorite

Speaking of Entertainment

More by Staff Report

Latest in Other Arts

© 2018 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation