Prison moves during first term come back to haunt Jerry Brown 

History should record the late 1970s as an era of pivotal socio-economic change in California — a new wave of international migration, a shift from an industrial to a post-industrial economy and a new baby boom.

Political events also abounded, topped by passage of Proposition 13, but including collective bargaining for public employees, expansion of mail-in voting, a decline in major-party registration and the eruption of crime as a powerful issue.

By happenstance, Jerry Brown was governor as this socio-economic tsunami crashed into California and played a central role in its political aspects.

The crime issue was especially vexing for Brown, a longtime opponent of capital punishment, and he responded by signing dozens of lock-’em-up anti-crime bills. Not surprisingly, the new laws and tougher attitudes by prosecutors and judges began raising the prison population.

When Brown became governor, the state had about 20,000 men and women behind bars and hadn’t built a new prison in many years. By the end of his governorship, prisons were packed and corrections officials were begging for new space.

Reluctantly, Brown supported a $495 million bond issue to jump-start prison construction.
During the 1980s and early ’90s, billions of dollars were spent on dozens of new prisons.

The Department of Corrections mushroomed into an agency with tens of thousands of employees, and the California Correctional Peace Officers Association became a very powerful political force.

However, expansion of prisons lagged for political and financial reasons, and they now house 79 percent more inmates than their designed capacity.

On Monday, by a 5-4 vote written by Californian Anthony Kennedy, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the state must reduce overcrowding by building more prisons, releasing inmates or shifting them into other facilities.

By happenstance, Brown is governor again and has a plan to move more than 30,000 low-security inmates into county jails while reforming parole to reduce recidivism, declaring that “the prison system has been a failure.”

However, the plan hinges on billions of dollars in tax extensions that have been stalled for months. The Supreme Court’s decree could give Brown’s plan a political boost, but it also could mean he would preside over a massive release of inmates.

While prisons have become voters’ least popular spending category, releasing felons is fraught with political peril. What goes around comes around.

Dan Walters’ Sacramento Bee columns on state politics are syndicated by the Scripps Howard News Service.

About The Author

Dan Walters

Pin It

© 2018 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation