Governor’s budget plan appears to be far from the really big fix 

As California’s economy roared in the middle years of the last decade — an unsustainable bubble fueled by mortgage funny-money — income and sales taxes flooded into the state treasury.

General-fund revenue climbed by one-third from $76.8 billion in 2003-04 to more than $102 billion in 2007-08. And Republican Schwarzenegger and a Legislature controlled by Democrats spent every nickel and then some.

When the housing bubble burst, however, revenue plummeted as fast as it had climbed, only to be stabilized a bit when he and lawmakers enacted temporary boosts in income, sales and car taxes in 2009.

Meanwhile, however, the spending commitments Schwarzenegger and legislators made during the bubble remained largely intact, leaving the general-fund budget — on paper, anyway — near the $100 billion level. So for a few years, they closed the “structural deficit” with the temporary taxes, temporary spending cuts, backdoor borrowing and bookkeeping gimmicks.

Schwarzenegger’s successor, Jerry Brown, proclaims that he will tolerate no more fiscal evasions and wants both permanent spending cuts and a five-year extension of the temporary taxes to balance the general-fund budget in the range of $85 billion to $90 billion.

Brown, however, would divert much of the extended tax revenue stream to local governments to pay for programs shifted from the state and — this is the big rub — give them a constitutional guarantee that state financing would continue even after the taxes expired in 2015-16.

Would the money be there? His own budget sees nothing better than a modest recovery by mid-decade, which darkens the prospect of revenue growing back to the range of $95 billion to $100 billion.
There’s scant evidence of a strong recovery in the latest unemployment data, showing tepid job growth and a state jobless rate of 12.4 percent.

The state has lost upward of 1.5 million jobs since the recession began. It would take a half-decade of very strong growth to return employment to prerecession levels.

Realistically, therefore, California will not have truly recovered when the temporary taxes expire again — if, indeed, the Legislature asks voters to extend them and voters agree.

Brown’s budget is probably not the permanent fiscal fix he depicts it as being. It’s more likely another postponement of the day of reckoning until either he’s safely in his second term or has bequeathed the headache to someone else.

Dan Walters’ Sacramento Bee columns on state politics are syndicated by the Scripps Howard News Service.

About The Author

Dan Walters

Pin It

© 2018 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation