Government should maintain amphibious abilities of Marines 

Gen. Douglas MacArthur had them on the run.

The dramatic “end-run” amphibious landing at Inchon had turned the tide in the Korean War. In October 1950, MacArthur planned to catch the retreating North Korean forces with another amphibious assault at Wonsan. But this time, the surprise was on MacArthur. The enemy had fled before his men could land.

Wonsan, however, was still historic. It was the last major combat amphibious assault attempted by the U.S. Sixty years on, in a May 2010 speech, then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates questioned whether it would ever be “sensible to launch another major amphibious landing again.”

The Marine Corps, naturally, was apoplectic, since attacks from the sea are considered its core competency. It seemed as though the boss was publicly questioning the Marines’ purpose. But before he left office, Gates effectively answered his own rhetorical question in the affirmative. It happened when he ordered U.S. forces to intervene in Libya.

The backbone of the initial response: the Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group. A three-ship formation led by the USS Kearsarge, the group includes some 2,000 Marines and their aviation assets — Harrier attack jets, helicopters and the hybrid V-22 Osprey that carries cargo and personnel.

Amphibious Ready Groups are like a Swiss Army knife; they can do a little bit of everything. At midnight March 21, Harrier pilot C.J. was eating lunch in the ship mess when he got word to launch for a combat search-and-rescue mission. A downed F-15 pilot was being chased by a small convoy of Moammar Gadhafi’s thugs.

As C.J. jetted to the scene, he could hear the pilot breathlessly whispering for help as dogs barked and shots rang out in the background. Soon, C.J. delivered some well-placed ordnance that convinced the pilot’s pursuers to call it an early night.

Behind C.J. came Brillo in a V-22. The V-22 can fly like a helicopter or a plane. Carrying a 15-man quick-reaction force, Brillo’s craft — operating in blackout mode — came in at 200 feet and 300 mph. He then flipped the engine and settled in a landing zone near the downed flier. One minute later, the rescued pilot was headed back to the Kearsarge.

All in a day’s work for the Marines of the Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group. During this nine-month deployment, the group had done a little bit of everything — supporting combat operations in Afghanistan, running counter-piracy ops in the Gulf of Aden and training with forces from other countries in the Gulf States and the Horn of Africa. And then there was Libya.

The logbook of the helicopter-dock landing ship Kearsarge answers the question of why we have amphibious forces. They are among the most responsive and cost-effective means to project U.S. power around the world. In fact, we don’t have enough of them. The Pentagon should be buying more assets such as the America class amphibious assault ships, as well as speeding the purchase of F-35Bs, the short take-off, vertical landing replacements for aging Harriers.

Gates erred in downplaying the value of an amphibious force. As one Marine officer put it, “Amphib ships and marines are mules” — they get fed last, even though they do all the work. If we don’t maintain a robust amphibious force, the barn could be empty when the next crisis comes.

James Jay Carafano is a senior research fellow for national security at The Heritage Foundation.

About The Author

James Carafano

Pin It

Speaking of Opinion, Op Eds

More by James Carafano

Latest in Guest Columns

© 2018 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation