Ferocious puppy panic leads woman into frivolous lawsuit 

Personal injury law is big business. It is one of the most contentious areas of law, and often one of the trickiest. For example, if you injure yourself while fleeing a charging dog, can you sue? Who can you sue? And do the details about the dog matter?

A recent case in Mississippi raised these exact questions. Lenetra Outlaw went shopping at her local Penny Pinchers discount grocery in West Point, Miss. Suddenly Outlaw heard a sound that gripped her with fear and panic. It was the terrifying sound of a dog barking, and claws hitting the store’s hard floors as a ferocious beast came charging down the aisle.

Outlaw was extremely afraid of dogs. She ran down the aisle, turned, and sought escape from her brutal foe by leaping on top of a freezer. The jump aggravated a previously existing hip injury, prompting Outlaw to sue Penny Pinchers and Cindy Scott, the store manager who owned this vicious attack dog.

A Mississippi state court jury found for Outlaw and awarded her $130,000, finding Penny Pinchers 70 percent at fault and Scott 30 percent to blame. That seems reasonable enough, but probably I should have mentioned earlier that the allegedly ferocious beast was really a 4-month-old Dachshund puppy — a little wiener dog weighing just four pounds.

Scott, the store manager, had been bringing her adorable puppy Sophie to work every day. The pleasant little doggie never attacked anyone. Scott usually kept Sophie behind the counter — so that no one would step on the little thing. Outlaw’s injury would seem to be solely the result of her own overreaction.

In light of these facts, Penny Pinchers and Scott decided an appeal was in order. The issue facing the Mississippi Court of Appeals in Penny Pinchers v. Outlaw: Did the presence of the 4-month-old pooch create an unreasonably dangerous condition at Penny Pinchers that day?

The court noted that the Mississippi Supreme Court had held that dogs are not dangerous per se. To impose liability on a dog owner for personal injuries, a plaintiff must show the dog had a propensity for violence and that the owner knew it. And Sophie the wiener dog, that 4-month-old, four-pound bundle of love, had a clean record.

The appeals court went on to hold that a premises does not have to be completely safe from any hazard — only reasonably safe — and that the plaintiff’s own actions can be considered in determining liability.

“We acknowledge Outlaw’s extreme fear of dogs,” Judge Thomas Griffis wrote for the court in overturning the jury’s verdict. “However, we cannot say that it was reasonable for Penny Pinchers to anticipate that anyone, even someone with a great fear of dogs, would have such a reaction to Sophie’s presence in the store.”

So Mississippi dog owners need not fear lawsuits over injuries people cause themselves by overreacting. On the other hand, if you suffer from extreme puppy panic, you might want to consider moving to another state.

David Horrigan is a Washington, D.C. lawyer and the editorial director of Courtweek.com.

About The Author

David Horrigan

Pin It

Speaking of...

Latest in Guest Columns

© 2019 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation