Court denies expense tax deductions for medical marijuana dispensaries 

click to enlarge Shut down: Under a ruling passed down by the U.S. Tax Court, The City’s recently closed marijuana dispensary Vapor Room cannot claim business expense tax deductions because the shop was dedicated to providing weed and not caregiving. - S.F. EXAMINER FILE PHOTO
  • S.F. Examiner File Photo
  • Shut down: Under a ruling passed down by the U.S. Tax Court, The City’s recently closed marijuana dispensary Vapor Room cannot claim business expense tax deductions because the shop was dedicated to providing weed and not caregiving.

The U.S. Tax Court has ruled against a San Francisco medical marijuana seller, snuffing out his business expense deductions, in a decision highlighting the industry’s legal limbo.

The court ruled two weeks ago, in only its second decision on medical marijuana, that Martin Olive, sole proprietor of the Vapor Room Herbal Center, could not claim business expense tax deductions.

Under a 1982 U.S. Tax Code rule, marijuana businesses are banned from claiming business tax deductions for rent, Internet and other costs. But in 2007, the Tax Court gave such businesses some leeway. In its first ruling on the issue, the court said pot sellers could deduct expenses clearly related to “caregiving” services.

The Vapor Room said its marijuana sales were intertwined with legal caregiving services. But the Tax Court rejected this argument, saying the Vapor Room existed almost exclusively to sell marijuana. The Vapor Room closed last month after its landlord received a letter from U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag warning of property seizures and stiff prisons sentences if the club remained.

The ruling underlined how important it is for cannabis businesses to keep records identifying caregiving services.

“If you are going to be successful in this industry, you need to set your books properly from day one,” said Kris Krane, a managing partner with 4Front Advisors, which offers consulting services to medical marijuana businesses.

In addition, the ruling showed the tax peril faced by dispensary operators, who need to pay federal taxes, but in doing so risk exposing themselves to federal prosecution.

Tax records could be used as evidence against a drug seller if federal prosecutors pressed charges.

In October 2011, U.S. prosecutors across California launched an enforcement campaign to shut down marijuana businesses.

“They are caught between a rock and a hard place,” said Joel Newman, a professor at Wake Forest University Law School. “The more seriously you act, the more trouble you might get into.”

Pin It
Favorite
Thursday, May 24, 2018

Videos

Most Popular Stories

© 2018 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation