Carroll: Bennet doesn’t get spending, Social Security 

Vince Carroll of the Denver Post writes that Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., for all of his promises to contain spending, shows little willingness to make “hard choices” and a surprisingly poor understanding of entitlement spending.

What gives me pause is not merely the fact that Bennet spent much of the campaign attacking Buck for proposing even small-caliber spending cuts — such as at the Education Department.

After all, it’s conceivable Bennet has better ideas for savings. Except he doesn’t. Every time I’ve heard Bennet hold forth — in three debates and on three occasions with the Post editorial board — his discussion of spending has been maddeningly noncommittal. And while he’s sharpened his positions of late, he has offered hardly any ideas that are a cinch to reap major savings.

Well, maybe one. In a visit to The Post, Bennet said he favored adding a month “every year going forward” to the Social Security retirement age of workers in their 20s. And while that would help overcome the program’s long-term shortfall, it almost certainly wouldn’t erase the gap — a fact Bennet didn’t realize.

“I actually think you can solve the problem just by raising the age,” he told us. No, not unless you plan to push full benefits north of age 70, which is rather extreme.

By contrast, if you hike the age to 70, you offset just one-third of the shortfall, according to a report released this summer by the Senate’s Special Committee on Aging.

About The Author

David Freddoso

Bio:
David Freddoso came to the Washington Examiner in June 2009, after serving for nearly two years as a Capitol Hill-based staff reporter for National Review Online. Before writing his New York Times bestselling book, The Case Against Barack Obama, he spent three years assisting Robert Novak, the legendary Washington... more
Pin It
Favorite

More by David Freddoso

Latest in Nation

© 2018 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation