American union workers want to know how their dues are spent 

As a member of the United Food and Commercial Workers, I’m more knowledgeable than most about the ins and outs of union finance.

In fact, I’ve learned interesting things about my own chapter’s spending habits — the $2 million office condo it bought in Gaithersburg, Md., or the fact that the president makes more than $200,000 a year, plus other undocumented benefits.

Across the country, millions of union members pay dues because they believe union officials are providing a valuable service to them. I have no disagreement with that.

In the 28 states without right-to-work laws, including my home state of Maryland, even nonmember employees can be forced to contribute to a union just to keep their jobs.

Unfortunately, workers have precious little information about how their hard-earned paychecks are being spent. That’s why I was disappointed to learn that Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis abruptly reversed newly instituted union transparency guidelines before they took effect.

My union’s questionable spending habit isn’t an isolated problem. In 2008, a Los Angeles Times investigation revealed that Tyrone Freeman, then the president of the Service Employees International Union’s 160,000-member California affiliate, embezzled more than $1 million from unwitting members.

Another Chicago Sun-Times investigation found that $25 million from five union pension funds were diverted to political organizations, strip clubs and Las Vegas getaways.

These stories are shocking, but the occasional newspaper headline is no substitute for real transparency. Without stringent disclosure requirements, union members and nonmembers alike are left at the mercy of union officials, who have the power to collect dues without being held accountable for how that money is spent.

The public reporting guidelines Solis jettisoned included several common-sense additions to the Labor Management Relations Disclosure Act of 1959.

Under the proposed guidelines, union officials would have to disclose how much individual compensation they receive in the form of benefits, account for any travel and entertainment expenses and identify union income streams.

The fact is most workers want more information about how their money is being spent by union officials. Last year, a poll revealed that nearly 90 percent of union members support transparency requirements.

Disclosure is a simple but effective tool for fighting corruption and encouraging accountability. That’s why I filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court to stop Solis from rolling back the transparency requirements.

If you pay union dues, you have a right to know how your money is being spent. If almost 90 percent of union members see the need for transparency, why can’t Hilda Solis?

Chris Mosquera is a county government employee in Maryland.

About The Author

Chris Mosquera

Pin It

Latest in Guest Columns

© 2019 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation