Why ‘angry left’ is redundant 

Northwestern University School of Law professor James Lindgren publidhed a paper March 15th titled What Drives Views on Government Redistribution and Anti-Capitalism: Envy or a Desire for Social Dominance? In it he reports:

compared to anti-redistributionists, strong redistributionists have about two to three times higher odds of reporting that in the prior seven days they were angry, mad at someone, outraged, sad, lonely, and had trouble shaking the blues. Similarly, anti-redistributionists had about two to four times higher odds of reporting being happy or at ease. Not only do redistributionists report more anger, but they report that their anger lasts longer. When asked about the last time they were angry, strong redistributionists were more than twice as likely as strong opponents of leveling to admit that they responded to their anger by plotting revenge. Last, both redistributionists and anti-capitalists expressed lower overall happiness, less happy marriages, and lower satisfaction with their financial situations and with their jobs or housework.

Arnold Kling thanks Tyler Cowen for the cite and adds: “Apparently, the phrase “angry left” contains a redundancy.”

About The Author

Conn Carroll

Pin It

More by Conn Carroll

Latest in Nation

Saturday, Oct 22, 2016


Most Popular Stories

© 2016 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation