Use of public finance dollars raises concerns 

Mayor Gavin Newsom’s plan to balance the city budget by dipping into a $5 million fund set aside to finance political campaigns could leave nothing for candidates, critics said Wednesday.

However both Phil Ginsburg, Newsom’s chief of staff, and Supervisor Jake McGoldrick said Wednesday there will be more than enough money in the fund for those running this November and in 2011.

McGoldrick, in cooperation with the Mayor’s Office, amended the proposal Wednesday during the Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee meeting to require that if the Ethics Commission finds there are insufficient funds for the 2011 mayoral race, The City will sink $5 million into the fund.

"We’re all supportive of public financing. You can put your trust in the fact that that money will be there," McGoldrick said.

However, Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who proposed public financing for mayoral races, noted that "Oakland endured a similar desire and motivation to usurp public funds … but those funds were not replenished."

Newsom’s budget proposal used the $5 million to help close a projected $338 million deficit. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to vote on the $6.5 billion budget July 22.

Advocates of public campaign financing were worried the money would not be there for candidates in future years.

"You are setting a precedent of making this a slush fund to fund your favorite projects," said Steven Hill, director of political reform at the nonprofit New America Foundation.

Voters adopted The City’s first public campaign finance program for candidates for the Board of Supervisors in November 2000. The board’s budget committee will vote next week whether to send the proposal to the full Board of Supervisors.

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com

Tags: ,

Pin It
Favorite

More by Joshua Sabatini

Latest in Government & Politics

Saturday, Dec 3, 2016

Videos

Readers also liked…

Most Popular Stories

© 2016 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation