Talks between PG&E and San Bruno appear to stall 

click to enlarge Talks between San Bruno and PG&E appear to have broken down. - SF EXAMINER FILE PHOTO
  • SF Examiner file photo
  • Talks between San Bruno and PG&E appear to have broken down.

San Bruno city officials accused PG&E Wednesday of walking out of negotiations over compensation for the 2010 gas pipeline explosion that killed eight people and destroyed a neighborhood in the Peninsula city.

“You can call it an impasse, you can call it what you want,” San Bruno Mayor Jim Ruane said at a news conference Wednesday morning.

Ruane said the city would pursue a parallel path to restitution. This week, San Bruno filed legal papers to participate in an existing investigation by the California Public Utilities Commission. That would make the city a party to any potential settlement between the utility and the commission.

Yet PG&E officials denied that talks had broken down and said they had set up a meeting with San Bruno for Friday. A San Bruno spokesman said the appointment was made on Wednesday.

“One of the things that I know we can both agree on is we both have a very strong, passionate desire to resolve this thing for the city quickly,” PG&E Senior Vice President Greg Pruett said.

He said the utility has already established a $70 million trust to rebuild San Bruno and a $100 million fund for expenses in the wake of the disaster. He said PG&E was open to offering additional compensation.

In November, according to correspondence provided to the media, San Bruno and the utility agreed to hold confidential negotiations about a settlement that would go beyond the $170 million the utility has so far pledged. The proposed settlement would not pay for expenses directly associated with the disaster.

In an August letter, PG&E President Christopher Johns suggested that the utility could pay for scholarships or sports leagues for neighborhood children, mental health resources, contributions to local non-profits, or support of a library, memorial or park.

Ruane said such additional compensation would go toward healing the city’s spirit.

“The way I look at it is, we are in fact a victim, in a different way,” he said. “We were victimized as a community.”

About The Author

Amy Crawford

Pin It

Speaking of Local, Peninsula

Latest in Peninsula

Tuesday, Oct 25, 2016


Most Popular Stories

© 2016 The San Francisco Examiner

Website powered by Foundation