A legal filing by environmental groups that are trying to shutter Sharp Park Golf Course in Pacifica hit a roadblock Thursday when a federal judge issued a stay on the lawsuit until October.
The golf course, which is owned by San Francisco but located in Pacifica, has been a hot topic for environmentalists for years. The Wild Equity Institute and other environmental groups claim that the golf course violates provisions of the Endangered Species Act by infringing on the habitats of the San Francisco Garter Snake and the California red-legged frog. The groups, which assert that water pumping and lawn mowers harm the endangered species, had hoped to shut down Sharp Park immediately.
However, on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston denied those claims, ordering a stay on the lawsuit until the Fish and Wildlife Service completes a biological study of Sharp Park. If that study is not completed by October, however, the lawsuit can resume.
But the day wasn’t a total loss for environmentalists. The city of San Francisco requested the lawsuit be rejected, but Illston also issued a stay on that motion until October.
The golf course has also been a hot topic in San Francisco politics.
In December, the Board of Supervisors approved legislation that would have entered San Francisco into negotiations with the National Park Service to transfer the course back to the national agency.
The legislation, which was vetoed by Mayor Ed Lee, would not have mandated the closure of the course. At the time, critics said the 18-hole course would have been shuttered had it been transferred to the NPS.